Index 2022
Mayor
2022, All cities
3.71
1 2 3 4 5 Ruse Dobrich Razgrad Targovishte Yambol Burgas Sliven Vidin Lovech Pernik Sofia Stara Zagora Shumen Gabrovo Pleven Plovdiv Veliko Turnovo Montana Varna Kyustendil Vratsa Smolyan Pazardzhik Blagoevgrad Haskovo Silistra Kardzhali

The overall score of the mayor’s institution in 2022 is 3,71 points. The leading places in the ranking are taken by the Mayors of Ruse (4,59 points) and Dobrich (4,35 points), while the Mayors of Kardzhali (2.41 points), Silistra (2.74 points) and Haskovo (2.92 points) are at the bottom of the ranking.

 

The study of the capacity of the mayor’s institution is based on an assessment of the ability to implement a clear management vision and mobilize the necessary resources for community development. In 13 of the surveyed municipalities, the mayors (with mandates for the period 2019-2023) have ensured publicity and accountability on the implementation of their management program. The Mayors of Dobrich, Ruse and Lovech have demonstrated a significant level of reporting on the goals achieved. A retreat from established reporting practices in comparison to the previous survey was identified in Gabrovo and Sofia.

 

The role of the mayor in building a sustainable Local Integrity System is studied through the prism of three indicators: management of the local administration, control over the providers of public services, transparent interaction with local business and impartial approach in the control of compliance with the rules of economic activity. The indicators on transparency in the selection of external contractors and control over suppliers have the lowest score with a total value for all municipalities of 3.33 points. The 2022 survey reiterated previous findings regarding the unsatisfactory degree of transparency of the consultative process and the interaction with business and civil society organizations on municipal development policies and important management decisions. The total score for this indicator is 3.57 points, and it is significantly lower in several municipalities (Kardzhali, Silistra and Haskovo).

values of Mayor indexes
Capacity 3.82
А clear vision for development 3.77

The mayor's vision for the development of the municipality, including measures for good governance and prevention of corruption 3.54

Public access to reports for the implementation of the strategy 3.30

Other foreseen strategic objectives/programs 4.47

Sustainable Resources 3.88

Adoption of an annual programme for investment/capital expenditures, which takes into account the needs of the citizens of the municipality 3.66

External resources accumulated through projects, in addition to the municipal budget 4.82

Public information available with reports regarding the implementation of projects by the municipality 3.13

Role 3.53
Management of the Local Administration 3.66

Competitions and criteria for proven professional capabilities in the appointments in the municipal administration 4.08

Qualification and training opportunities for municipal administration staff 3.25

Control over Local Service Providers 3.34

Transparency in the selection of external service providers for projects/activities of the municipality 3.52

Implemented control over external public service providers 3.17

Interaction with the Local Business 3.58

Regular consultations with the local business in the process of adoption/amendment of regulations 2.91

Public information regarding the rules for regulation over the activities of the local business, published on the municipal website 4.38

Control bodies in the municipality implement check-ups on the basis of pre-scheduled planning and clear criteria 3.45

Governance 3.79
Budget Transparency 4.23

Transparency of the process of drafting the municipal budget 4.34

Transparency of the municiapl budget implementation 4.71

Transparency of the Mayor's team work 3.65

Accountability of the Mayor 3.11

Organization of meetings with citizens by the mayor (разместен с долния ред) 3.04

Publicly accessible information on the implementation of important decisions (разместен с горния ред) 3.04

Mayor and his/her team use a variety of accountability tools 3.25

Integrity of the Local Executive 4.03

Ethics code/code of conduct adopted for the members of the managing team of the municipality 4.04

Public policy established by the mayor and his/her team for ethical conduct and integrity 4.08

Lack of public scandals related to unethical conduct, conflict of interest and corrupt behavior of the managing team of the municipality in the past one year 3.97